2007 Industry Failures and What WE Learned
You may not know this but the credit card industry is notorious for covering up its failures. While most experts will tell you that failure is important, as it teaches us what not to do and shows us how things can get done, the credit card industry is known for not learning from it’s mistakes. Just look at how Visa again and again tries to attempt a solid risk management tool with one major failure after another.
I decided to profile some of the recent industry failures because no one wants to talk about them, but I think they are an important part of the process as they teach us and force us to look back and realize what we’ve learned. This isn’t an attack on these companies as I am confident most were run by good, solid people, but rather a look back at what went wrong. Its easy now, as hindsight is always 20/20, but it’s a start.
PaybyTouch - Possibly one of the largest failures in the risk arena. PaybyTouch started out by promising that biometrics will end fraud, but founder Mr. John Rogers quickly found out that few retailers, especially brick and mortar, had a problem with fraud. While it’s common place in gas stations and similar service arenas, the problem just wasn’t that big. Still, Mr. Rogers managed to raise over $250 Million from some major players in the industry. Unfortunately, in the last few months they were pushed into bankruptcy and will soon be forced to shut its doors.
The learning experience here was as old as business itself. They try to build too quickly before clients even existed which isn’t uncommon but when they realized that wasn’t going to happen, they quickly started buying up other failing businesses but none of those panned out. The goal became simple, buy up some sizable failures like Card Systems, absorb their cost into the business and end up ahead. The problem became that the sum of the parts was greater than the whole as employees of the buyouts were never fired and expenses continued to rise.
While biometrics was always a pipe dream, it’s amazing that Rogers was able to raise a quarter of a billion dollars and no one questioned the long term strategy. Oh well, maybe someday someone will find the key to making the biometrics industry work but clearly it’s not going to be PayByTouch.
Comerxia - no site available - Now these guys were interesting. Overnight they became a buzz word, attracting investors such as UPS and other major shipping companies and then without warning, they went out of business. Just like PayByTouch, they tried to build too fast. The promise was simple: allow merchants to sell internationally without the fear of chargebacks but it quickly turned south. The problem Comerxia had was that they insisted on handling the shipping, product storage, and ultimately fulfillment which led to their downfall. They spent nearly $25 Million to build out huge warehouses to store items, millions more on customer service channels and even more on marketing. While they did manage to attract some major names such as Shoes.com, they simply didn’t build up enough steam. The end was pretty bad as they took in tens of millions in merchandise, millions more in credit card payments and then ultimately filed bankruptcy. Unfortunately this is another example of an industry failure that was just pushed under the rug as its bankruptcy proceedings got even uglier. Unfortunately, I think the lesson once again learned is you have to be realistic as it comes to time frames and expectations. The merchant services industry is very hard and to get consumers to change their buying patterns, even when merchants are pushing them, isn’t an overnight thing, which is what Comerxia was looking for.
Paily - This is really an interesting story. In 2001, a company out of Israel started named NPX. For the next few years, NPX, even with local venture funding, was nothing more than another risk management consulting firm. In 2005, they introduced a poorly executed third party billing solution that offered merchants zero chargeback liability, called Paily. They also figured on charging the end consumer the bulk of the fees rather than the merchant. A year later, they closed up that shop. Where it gets interesting is that they then took those clients, raised $11 Million dollars and reworked its failed business into a new venture Fraud Sciences which ultimately is the same product as Paily, with a few small tweaks. It’s shocking to see this type of hubris for a company as to just screw over its past merchants, close up shop in Israel and then re-open in the United States with its old clients. Is anyone watching this stuff? And more so, what lies did they tell to their current venture group to get new funding? I can only imagine it was one excuse or another to explain their past failure. The lesson here would be, don’t try to cover up your old mistakes, accept them and embrace the fact that on the internet, everything gets out.
Merchant Sense - Unfortunately, yet another example of a guy with a few bucks looking to make out like a bandit. While it may come off as a simple and professional solution, the reality is that it’s simply a few pages with two scripts behind it. While MerchantSense did a good job at getting the name out there and lasting it out, the reality is it was only one person who was simply hoping to make it big and use the money to build the business. Unfortunately, in the end, he tried to sell the project on SitePoint’s Marketplace for $80k only to realize the highest price on the table was $2,000.00. I would say here again, be realistic with your expectations. Not having any revenue is also going to be a downfall in selling the company. While people would buy a company based on technology without a doubt when the technology is good, when you can’t show off an interface, historical results, or anything more than a few HTML pages, you are going to have problems.
Failures expected in 2008 - these are my projections for 2008, take them as you wish.
Order Spy - An example of a good idea with bad execution. After years of trying to garner a single client, Order Spy went extreme on its pricing and figured, heck, we can’t sell it at $4.95 a month, let’s try for $995 a month. The company is currently run by a father and son team but the father was looking to retire a while ago and they have since been trying to sell the project for $100k, but no takers. I figure they have a net value of about $5k but considering they have spent at least $50k in cost and time, I don’t imagine they will part so cheaply.
StrikeForce - What’s shocking about these folks is their lack of reality. While they were failing over a year ago, their top management was still taking $120k a year salaries and it was only recently that they cut it in half. Bankruptcy is right around the corner for these folks, with many of its employees jumping ship already.
Vindicia - Come on guys, you raised some money, you spent it, and now you are trying to reshape your failing business. It’s a nice design but you are going to need more substance to that business. This one may not fail, but it’s definitely on a vine. The reality is that there is simply no interest in post chargeback management, why would anyone care about something that has already been written off? The fact is there is a small market but until you guys find some real partners or wake up and smell the real opportunity out there, you are going to find yourselves on the bad end of bankruptcy court trying to explain to your old investors why they feel cheated and shouldn’t sue personally.
Notable Mentions
Verifone - Wow, these guys really screwed up. Talk about throwing dirt on dirt. Once a pillar of the merchant services community, Verifone has become the water cooler joke of Wall Street. The fact is that while these guys may always find a way to continue in one fashion or another, their recent Wall Street downfalls will not go unnoticed. For those of you not paying attention, Verifone spent 2007 alienating their partners, thumbing their nose at Wall Street and violated more SEC rules than I care to mention. Good luck guys!

Comment by Sock Yee on 4 January 2008:
If we look at it, it’s really a worrying trend. I believe this is not only limited to private companies but to banks as well. Just look at the current mess we’ve made with the reckless lending leading to the mortgage woes. Many of them fail because proper planning has not been properly carried out and most important thing, too much emphasis has been to achieve short-term goals.
Comment by kenneth landau on 7 January 2008:
in re Comerxia, 90% of what you write is incorrect. I’m one of the co-founders, so I would know. Yes we failed, and in that you are right….but next time get your facts straight, as numbers are severely exaggerated there….and we did not build too fast, it took us 4 years to go to market with the product that ultimately was the solution for all merchants. And we did not built huge warehouses, as a matter of fact we outsourced ALL our logistics, until the end, that we were required by merchants to set up our own, which we did (very modestly), but only one in south Florida. Investment?, not even close to what you posted there….get your facts straight, then write what you want!!!….
Comment by Riley Poole on 7 January 2008:
Hi Kenneth and welcome to Merchant Talk. With all due respect then, would you please explain your version of why you feel Comerxia failed?
Comment by Toni P on 7 January 2008:
Look at what I found!! I think there is more to the story http://www.revenews.com/brookschaaf/2006/08/yes-comerixa-has-faltered.html
Great find Riley, wow ken, deadpool central!!
Comment by khairun on 25 January 2008:
wow, this is a nice long list. I never thought there’s so many failures before, probably coz I was too young at that time? Probably they didn’t learn from these but I definitely did. Thanks for the awesome post. =)
Comment by Strom crow on 26 January 2008:
Thanks for your valuable post. Lots of failures, should be known by all. Basically i am new to this field i learned about the failures and it will useful to me. Thanks lol.
Comment by Tom Mahoney on 27 January 2008:
I Thought I might throw in a “destined to fail” category here. I’ve already seen a few of these pop up and then go away. A couple of start-ups have approached me looking for endorsement, convinced that they have the answer to preventing credit card fraud. I try pointing out the big hole in their theory but they just don’t seem to get it.
I’m talking about the services that offer to automatically place a telephone call to a potential customer to verify that they are actually holding the credit card. You know; something like press “1″ if you accept this charge, press “2″ if you don’t. Some of them ask for the ‘customer’ to repeat a key phrase - or maybe just the fact that someone answers will be enough.
Those that haven’t failed yet, will - for two reasons.
First, they offer very little protection from fraud. Unless the telephone number called is the BANK VERIFIED phone number, it means nothing. A would-be thief has no problem using his own phone number (probably a disposable cell) and will be more than happy to give the system whatever response it wants. At Merchant911.org and in the fraud prevention course that I wrote for merchants, I discourage even regular voice calls to anything but the bank verified phone number. Anything else is useless, or worse - giving a false sense of security.
Second - the on-line merchants that are targeted by these companies’ marketing efforts are small merchants that simply are not willing, or able, to spend more money on fraud prevention services. The high volume merchants are well aware of the fallacy of the service.
I have, and will continue to, stick my neck out and actively denounce these services for what they are.
Tom Mahoney, Director
Merchant911.org
Comment by Riley Poole on 27 January 2008:
Thank you for that in-depth review of the pay to call service. I’ve personally seen a few of them come and go and think that it’s a disgrace the lack of value these services bring to the table. I certainly give them value for trying but at least provide some reasonable screening to these merchants. Thank you Mr. Mahoney.
Comment by benz on 2 February 2008:
What seem to be working out are still those practical ways to avoid online fraud particularly online transactions. Advocacy still plays a big role .